[Bug 239883] Review Request: powertop - power usage tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: powertop - power usage tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239883


notting@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |notting@xxxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From notting@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-05-11 20:16 EST -------
MUST items:
 - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK
 - Spec file matches base package name. - OK
 - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK
 - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK
 - License - OK
 - License field in spec matches - OK
 - License file included in package - ***
  *** should include COPYING in doc

 - Spec in American English - OK
 - Spec is legible. - OK
 - Sources match upstream md5sum: - OK

 - Package needs ExcludeArch - N/A
 - BuildRequires correct - OK
 - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A
 - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. - N/A
 - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK
 - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK
 - Package has correct buildroot  - OK
 - Package is code or permissible content. - OK
 - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A
 - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - N/A

 - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. - N/A
 - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun  - N/A
 - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig - N/A
 - .so files in -devel subpackage. - N/A
 - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}  - N/A
 - .la files are removed. - N/A

 - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file - N/A

 - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK
 - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK
 - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK
 - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK
 - No rpmlint output. - see above
 - final provides and requires are sane: - OK

SHOULD Items:

 - Should build in mock. - didn't test
 - Should build on all supported archs - tested on i386
 - Should function as described. - OK
 - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A
 - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - N/A
 - Should have dist tag - OK
 - Should package latest version - OK

Other things noted - could use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]