https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333 --- Comment #26 from Miloslav Trmač <mitr@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to James (purpleidea) from comment #22) > (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #19) > > After discussion with mitr, I am going to drop the polkit rule for now. The > > policy is too big hammer ATM. We need something more tailored. > > Unfortunately, I am not libvirt nor polkit expert. This should be probably > > solved in similar manner to bug 957300. > > > > I'm not sure entirely how this relates to the other bug Including the file we are talking about, pretty much verbatim (except perhaps using a different group name), in one of the main libvirt packages, would be a resolution to bug 957300. (This does not automatically mean that this is precisely the right thing to do, but if this is to be done anywhere it should be in the main libvirt srpm). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review