https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333 --- Comment #20 from Michael Adam <madam@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #19) > After discussion with mitr, I am going to drop the polkit rule for now. The > policy is too big hammer ATM. We need something more tailored. Agreed, though it is very convenient. ;-) > Unfortunately, I am not libvirt nor polkit expert. This should be probably > solved in similar manner to bug 957300. > > > Thanks for the review! > > > New Package SCM Request > ======================= > Package Name: vagrant-libvirt > Short Description: libvirt provider for Vagrant > Upstream URL: https://github.com/pradels/vagrant-libvirt > Owners: vondruch jstribny obnox > Branches: > InitialCC: Can we request a f21 branch right away? I will then take care of the f21 builds. Michael -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review