https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183255 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint output ============== perl-Crypt-Random-Seed.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic perl-Crypt-Random-Seed.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. requires ======== perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 provides ======== perl(Crypt::Random::Seed) = 0.03 perl-Crypt-Random-Seed = 0.03-1.fc22 checklist ========= - rpmlint OK - package and spec file naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is same as perl, OK for Fedora, matches upstream - license text is packaged with %license - spec file written in English and is legible - source matches upstream, including timestamp - package builds OK in mock for Rawhide x86_64 - buildreqs OK - no locales, libraries etc. to be concerned about - no intention for the package to be relocatable - directory ownership and permissions OK - no duplicate files - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs, docs don't affect runtime - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - filenames are all ASCII notes ===== Consider adding runtime dependencies on perl(Crypt::Random::TESHA2) and perl(IO::Socket) to support non-default entropy sources. Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review