https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183924 Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- rpmlint output ============== perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unix -> UNIX, Unix, uni perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) timestamps -> time stamps, time-stamps, times tamps perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timestamps -> time stamps, time-stamps, times tamps perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multilog -> multilevel perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timestamp -> time stamp, time-stamp, times tamp perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unix -> UNIX, Unix, uni perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) timestamps -> time stamps, time-stamps, times tamps perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timestamps -> time stamps, time-stamps, times tamps perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multilog -> multilevel perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timestamp -> time stamp, time-stamp, times tamp 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. checklist ========= - rpmlint OK (just spelling complaints about technical terms) - package and spec file naming OK - package meets guidelines - license is same as perl, OK for Fedora, matches upstream - no license text to include - spec file written in English and is legible - source file matches upstream, including timestamp - package builds OK in mock for Rawhide x86_64, and is not arch-specific - buildreqs OK - no locales, libraries etc. to bother with - no intent to make the package relocatable - directory ownership and permissions OK - no duplicate files - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs, docs don't affect runtime - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - filenames are all ASCII notes ===== %description needs re-wording to improve English, e.g. s/provides/providing/ Should BR: perl itself, needed to run Makefile.PL Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review