https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185582 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: ======= - I'm not sure the License field is correct. Shouldn't that be just "License: GPLv3+" for the main package, and "License: BSD" for the -wireshark subpackage? - The build for device_driver_common.c triggers this warning 3 times: "warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing]". You may need to add -fno-strict-aliasing to the build flags to avoid problems. On the other hand, you could replace the lines that trigger these warnings with something like the following code, rather than turn off an optimization: uint16_t date; date = htole16(1900 + tm->tm_year); memcpy(&date_data[0], &date, sizeof(uint16_t)); - The code in src/libambit/hidapi appears to be a bundled library. Can the existing hidapi / hidapi-devel packages be used instead? - Is there a reason you are using a github checkout, rather than one of the tarballs at http://openambit.org/downloads/ ? ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in openambit [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: openambit-0.3-1.git5f2b784.fc21.x86_64.rpm openambit-libs-0.3-1.git5f2b784.fc21.x86_64.rpm openambit-devel-0.3-1.git5f2b784.fc21.x86_64.rpm openambit-wireshark-0.3-1.git5f2b784.fc21.x86_64.rpm openambit-0.3-1.git5f2b784.fc21.src.rpm openambit.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US movescount -> moves count, moves-count, viscountess openambit.x86_64: W: no-documentation openambit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openambit openambit-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation openambit-libs.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/libambit.rules openambit-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib openambit-wireshark.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pcap -> pap, cap, p cap openambit-wireshark.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US usbpcap -> capacious openambit-wireshark.x86_64: W: no-documentation openambit.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US movescount -> moves count, moves-count, viscountess 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- openambit.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US movescount -> moves count, moves-count, viscountess openambit.x86_64: W: no-documentation openambit.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openambit openambit-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation openambit-libs.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/libambit.rules openambit-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib openambit-wireshark.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pcap -> pap, cap, p cap openambit-wireshark.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US usbpcap -> capacious openambit-wireshark.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. Requires -------- openambit-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libc.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libudev.so.1()(64bit) libudev.so.1(LIBUDEV_183)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) systemd openambit-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libambit.so.0()(64bit) openambit-libs(x86-64) openambit (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh hicolor-icon-theme libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libQtNetwork.so.4()(64bit) libambit.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libqjson.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libudev.so.1()(64bit) libudev.so.1(LIBUDEV_183)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.0)(64bit) libz.so.1(ZLIB_1.2.2)(64bit) openambit-libs(x86-64) rtld(GNU_HASH) openambit-wireshark (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libwireshark.so.5()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) wireshark(x86-64) Provides -------- openambit-libs: libambit.so.0()(64bit) openambit-libs openambit-libs(x86-64) openambit-devel: openambit-devel openambit-devel(x86-64) openambit: appdata() appdata(openambit.appdata.xml) application() application(openambit.desktop) openambit openambit(x86-64) openambit-wireshark: openambit-wireshark openambit-wireshark(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- openambit-wireshark: /usr/lib64/wireshark/plugins/1.12.2/ambit.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/openambitproject/openambit/archive/5f2b7840d91121b44a9a16ac6d945b103a94c5a3.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 426d861741330b450d21616fc8474bbad30581e7203892deda05c5bf6107f74d CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 426d861741330b450d21616fc8474bbad30581e7203892deda05c5bf6107f74d Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1185582 -m fedora-21-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-21-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++, Perl Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review