https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: ======= No issues - package approved. ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 31 files have unknown license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/htm/ref (gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/htm(gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/doc/ref(gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/htm/tut(gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/doc (gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata(gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/doc/tut(gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/lib (gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/nr(gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/grp(gap-sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/tst(gap- sonata), /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/nri(gap-sonata) The gap-sonata package is obsoleted by this package - no duplicates. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: gap-pkg-sonata-2.6-4.fc22.noarch.rpm gap-pkg-sonata-2.6-4.fc22.src.rpm gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) nearrings -> earrings, n earrings, near rings gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nearrings -> earrings, n earrings, near rings gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nearring -> nearing, earring, n earring gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US abelian -> Belgian, Annabel, Anabel gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US semigroup -> semi group, semi-group, semipro gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pointwise -> point wise, point-wise, pointless gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US endomorphisms -> anthropomorphism gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphisms -> anthropomorphism gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphism -> metamorphism gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nearfields -> near fields, near-fields, airfields gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/doc/tut/answers.tex gap-pkg-sonata.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/gap/pkg/sonata/doc/ref/answers.tex gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) nearrings -> earrings, n earrings, near rings gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nearrings -> earrings, n earrings, near rings gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nearring -> nearing, earring, n earring gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US abelian -> Belgian, Annabel, Anabel gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US semigroup -> semi group, semi-group, semipro gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pointwise -> point wise, point-wise, pointless gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US endomorphisms -> anthropomorphism gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphisms -> anthropomorphism gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US automorphism -> metamorphism gap-pkg-sonata.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nearfields -> near fields, near-fields, airfields 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 21 warnings. Thes all look OK. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Requires -------- gap-pkg-sonata (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/update-gap-workspace gap-core Provides -------- gap-pkg-sonata: gap-pkg-sonata gap-sonata Source checksums ---------------- http://www.algebra.uni-linz.ac.at/Sonata/sonata-2.6/sonata-2.6.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 9dc712584b352eeed5ebf0ec907d3886f72bc6c5180a44af84079d2a96ba5f22 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 9dc712584b352eeed5ebf0ec907d3886f72bc6c5180a44af84079d2a96ba5f22 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1185018 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review