https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128754 Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Paulo Andrade <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Since it requires firefox in rhel, there it should not need to also be the owner of %{firefox_inst_dir}. In non rhel it does not explicitly require firefox, so, should be ok to co-own the directory. I say that because it usually is not considered a good idea to have multiple packages owning the same (file or) directory. Anyway looking at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership I think it should be worth opening a bug report asking for mozilla-filesystem to become the owner of %{moz_extensions}/%{firefox_app_id}, or, have the package also require firefox on Fedora. But I will not consider it a blocker. The package is approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review