https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #20) > Maybe I would suggest grouping BuildRequires with respective subpackage > (e.g., ruby-devel under "-n cairo-dock-ruby") to make the relationships > more obvious. Well, actually I object to this and I always recommend to write BRs in the same place (some other reviewers also suggests so) > > (What is difficult for noarch is that if B.noarch depends on A.%{?_isa}, and > > C%{?_isa} depends on B.noarch, then the %{?_isa} dependency between A and C > > becomes obscure.) > > [...] > > for now I want to make all %_isa specific because dependency is not simple > > This relates to cairo-dock-python2 only, or am I missing something? Anyway using %_isa is much safer. Or is this a blocker? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review