https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121601 --- Comment #27 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #23) > Did you want me to work on the 4.2.9 version instead? No. The 4.0.x version is OK. It's in much better shape and better tested than the 4.2.x version, which was more or less snapshot from a quick private stab at packaging it. I only uploaded it, because people were asking me for it on PM. > If we can have it in > Fedora it would be great, just so that we don't start out behind. My plan is to revisit 4.2.x and to upgrade at least rawhide to it, ASAP. [This all would not have been a problem if this review had worked out better than it did - One lesson learnt: Fedora's rename reviews are a PITA. Never use versioned package names - You'll regret it ;)] > For selinux stuff, you _could_ make the relevant semanage call in %post, Yep, but you surely know, we discourage people from doing ;) > The package has nontrivial setup > requirements in any case. ACK, I'll give the selinux folks a couple of days to respond to my RFE and then will decide what to do. > I think that one test fails because it assumes the files will be under > */share/html but they're really under *share/rt/html. I think if you just > patch t/web/query_log.t and change this line: Great catch - Patch applied! > At this point I think the 4.0.22 version is good to go, and I've set the > flag accordingly. sigh .... finally ... thank you, very much! > I will go ahead and look into the 4.2.9 version instead > if you like. I don't know if it needs the same tweaks you made in comment > 21. It does. I keep branches of both in a local git and still have to merge some changes. Also, rt-4.2.x has seen much less testing than rt-4.0.x and IIRC, suffers from different SELinux issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review