[Bug 1177926] Review Request: smuxi - Powerful, flexible, user-friendly chat client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926



--- Comment #16 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Mirco Bauer from comment #15)
> The current package split is problematic. It doesn't allow a console
> frontend only install without installing X11/GNOME packages. Also a
> smuxi-server only install without X11/GNOME packages is not possible.
> 
> Please re-evaluate my recommended package split:
> 
> * smuxi-engine
>   * smuxi-engine* libraries (the engine has plugins thus the wildcard is
> important)
>   * bin/smuxi-server
>   * smuxi-server.exe*
>   * man1/smuxi-server.1
>   * all other private libraries (SmartIrcr4net, Twitterizer, ServiceStack,
> etc)
> 
> * smuxi-frontend-gnome
>   * bin/smuxi-frontend-gnome
>   * smuxi-frontend-gnome* (this frontend has plugins thus the wildcard is
> important)
>   * man1/smuxi-frontend-gnome.1
> 
> * smuxi-frontend-stfl
>   * bin/smuxi-frontend-stfl
>   * smuxi-frontend-stfl.exe*
>   * man1/smuxi-frontend-stfl.1
> 
> This the smallest possible split that still allows to install a) server-only
> without X11/GUI dependencies, b) just the GNOME frontend c) just the console
> frontend (without X11/GUI)

Is it okay for you? --> https://www.diffchecker.com/5mm6aq3b

I wish keep smuxi, smuxi-engine, smuxi-stfl packages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]