https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926 --- Comment #16 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mirco Bauer from comment #15) > The current package split is problematic. It doesn't allow a console > frontend only install without installing X11/GNOME packages. Also a > smuxi-server only install without X11/GNOME packages is not possible. > > Please re-evaluate my recommended package split: > > * smuxi-engine > * smuxi-engine* libraries (the engine has plugins thus the wildcard is > important) > * bin/smuxi-server > * smuxi-server.exe* > * man1/smuxi-server.1 > * all other private libraries (SmartIrcr4net, Twitterizer, ServiceStack, > etc) > > * smuxi-frontend-gnome > * bin/smuxi-frontend-gnome > * smuxi-frontend-gnome* (this frontend has plugins thus the wildcard is > important) > * man1/smuxi-frontend-gnome.1 > > * smuxi-frontend-stfl > * bin/smuxi-frontend-stfl > * smuxi-frontend-stfl.exe* > * man1/smuxi-frontend-stfl.1 > > This the smallest possible split that still allows to install a) server-only > without X11/GUI dependencies, b) just the GNOME frontend c) just the console > frontend (without X11/GUI) Is it okay for you? --> https://www.diffchecker.com/5mm6aq3b I wish keep smuxi, smuxi-engine, smuxi-stfl packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review