[Bug 1183191] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Common Upgradeability Description Format (CUDF) library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183191



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ludlam <jon@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
I noticed that I have accidentally included the .o files into the main package.
However, on removing these, I now have a hard error: 

ocaml-cudf.x86_64: E: no-binary

I'm not convinced this is a real error though - the package contents are now:

/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/META
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf.cma
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_822_lexer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_822_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_c.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_checker.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_conf.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_printer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_type_lexer.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_type_parser.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_types.cmi
/usr/lib64/ocaml/cudf/cudf_types_pp.cmi
/usr/share/doc/ocaml-cudf
/usr/share/doc/ocaml-cudf/README

and I'm not sure that these are really noarch material.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]