https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131127 Dan Kenigsberg <danken@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(vdelima@xxxxxxxxx | |m) --- Comment #15 from Dan Kenigsberg <danken@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Once an independent safelease is available, Vdsm is going to require it, and use the binary shipped by it in /usr/libexec/safelease. Until that happens, vdsm would continue to contain its old implementation of safelease and run it from the old location. Placing safelease binary on the same location is counter-productive. Vitor is responsible on getting this ticket resolved, now that Yoav is no longer with us. Please sponsor him as the maintainer of the safelease package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review