https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179804 Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- Review: + mock build is successful for f22 - rpmlint output on rpms gave python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) favouring -> favoring, flavoring python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pypi -> typify python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US writeth -> writhe, writer, write python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US worketh -> worksheet python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codebase -> co debase, co-debase, code base python-nine.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) favouring -> favoring, flavoring python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pypi -> typify python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US writeth -> writhe, writer, write python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US worketh -> worksheet python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codebase -> co debase, co-debase, code base python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) favouring -> favoring, flavoring python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pypi -> typify python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US writeth -> writhe, writer, write python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US worketh -> worksheet python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codebase -> co debase, co-debase, code base python-nine.x86_64: E: no-binary python-nine-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 18 warnings. + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm tarball : fe1723ca5d3db5cb28a861dca9da1a4a0ce3614057fb07279ddb4905415d3aff upstream tarball : fe1723ca5d3db5cb28a861dca9da1a4a0ce3614057fb07279ddb4905415d3aff + License "Public Domain" is valid and included in LICENSE.rst file Suggestions: 1) This package is a noarch package please add BuildArch: noarch 2) Group tag is not needed even on EPEL6 so if you are not planning this package for el5, you can safely remove it though its not mandatory to remove. 3) as this is noarch package you can remove CFLAGS in %build Rest looks simple and fine :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review