[Bug 1121601] Review Request: rt - request tracker

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121601



--- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Trevor Cordes from comment #12)
> Hi, I just upgraded to F21 and (obviously) it broke my rt(3), so to my
> dismay I come here and see there is no rtX in F21 (yet?).  That may be a bit
> disturbing and suprising for upgraders.
Correct. rt3 is dead, gone and abandoned upstream, and should be removed
anywhere (comprising EPEL and Fedora), because running it is a security risk.

I had hoped this package was ready in time to replace rt3, unfortunately there
doesn't seem to be sufficient interest in rt in Fedora to provide a review :(

> Anyhow, what's the easiest way for me to rt back on my system.  I realize it
> will be rt4.  Should I just grab your src/spec you provide here and build it
> up myself?
That's what I do - I am using them ;)

>  Will the fc22 srpms work on fc21?
There also are fc21 versions on https://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages

I also have older versions of them on the packman repo
(ftp://packman.links2linux.de/pub/packman/fedora).
Likely I'll sync them with my Fedora submission.

> What's going to be the ongoing plan for rt on F21?
There is no plan - It's just that this review is stuck ;)

>  What's the best way for
> me to ensure I stay patched?
It certainly would be best to provide a review, such that these packages can be
provided through Fedora :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]