[Bug 239161] Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Libdnet - Perl Interface to libdnet
Alias: perl-Net-Libdnet

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239161





------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-05-09 10:30 EST -------
In %files, %{perl_vendorarch}/Net/* should be %{perl_vendorarch}/Net.

Missing br's on:
    perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
    perl(Test::More)

Fix those two items, and I'll approve.

+ source files match upstream:
 cec04f6a07cf9e9ec90077c7f3970ffc  Net-Libdnet-0.01.tar.gz
 cec04f6a07cf9e9ec90077c7f3970ffc  ../Net-Libdnet-0.01.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
+ latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate.
+ %clean is present.
+ debuginfo package looks complete.
+ rpmlint is silent.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
 ** perl-Net-Libdnet-0.01-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
 == rpmlint
 == provides
 Libdnet.so()(64bit)  
 perl(Net::Libdnet) = 0.01
 perl-Net-Libdnet = 0.01-1.fc6
 == requires
 libc.so.6()(64bit)  
 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)  
 libdnet.so.1()(64bit)  
 perl >= 0:5.006
 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)  
 perl(AutoLoader)  
 perl(Carp)  
 perl(DynaLoader)  
 perl(Exporter)  
 perl(strict)  
 perl(warnings)  
 ** perl-Net-Libdnet-debuginfo-0.01-1.fc6.x86_64.rpm
 == rpmlint
 == provides
 Libdnet.so.debug()(64bit)  
 perl-Net-Libdnet-debuginfo = 0.01-1.fc6
 == requires
+ %check is present and all tests pass:
 All tests successful.
 Files=10, Tests=59,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.26 cusr +  0.16 csys =  0.42 CPU)
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
X owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]