https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171624 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- Consider pointing the "fedora-review" at this ticket: fedora-review -b 1171624 It performs a lot of package review tests on the src.rpm and any built rpms and presents a list of what other issues might be relevant. > %files > %doc ReadMe.md > %license LICENSE > %{_libdir}/*.so.* > > %files doc > %doc ReadMe.md > %license LICENSE > %{_docdir}/%{name}/ Caution! %doc plus %_docdir inside the same spec file is non-trivial since Fedora 20 and leads to duplication of files in subpackages: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338 > %files devel > %{_libdir}/*.so > %{_libdir}/cmake/%{name}/ > %{_includedir}/%{name}/ This would be a case of an "unowned directory" as hinted by Antonia in comment 8. You either need to include the directory %_libdir/cmake or "Requires: cmake" to pull in the ownership from that package. If statismo-devel can be used without CMake, including the directory is _okay_, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function Also: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2014-December/010411.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review