https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174893 --- Comment #13 from Parag <pnemade@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #12) > (In reply to Parag from comment #11) > > I will suggest don't even generate metapackage. There is no use of > > generating empty packages. If you want to generate individual plugins then > > let the user install it separately. > > > > Group tag is unnecessary and is optional so good to remove it. > > > > The directory should have been chosen as dnf-plugins-extras similar like > > dnf-plugins. > > Users can install dnf-plugins-extras. Then he will get pile of plugins. > Users can install dnf-plugins-extras-pluginname. Then he will get only this > plugin. > I thought if we have separate packages then user will install them individually and not sure in future if they will find all the plugins in -extras to be installed using dnf-plugins-extras metapackage. Anyways it looks fine. > Directory for what? We will use dnf-plugins Dir and its OK. Ah! I only had a look at spec file and got confused by this line %{python_sitelib}/dnfpluginsextras/ Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review