Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: seaview - Graphical multiple sequence alignment editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239282 ------- Additional Comments From bjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-08 00:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.licr.org/pub/seaview-0.20070417-0.src.rpm I can't find anything in the packaging guidelines that specifically address "no version", so I could be wrong when I say this... To me it seems pointless to prefix the date with a 0. in this case. You will never have a number low enough that upstream can't trump you and release something like 0.01 which would be < EVR than yours. I would think this would be the perfect case for an epoch if upstream gets a clue and versions the package at a later date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review