[Bug 1172800] Review Request: dwgrep - A tool for querying Dwarf (debuginfo) graphs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172800



--- Comment #6 from Petr Machata <pmachata@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #5)
> The way the version is defined is unusual. Why not simply remove %{commit}
> and use %{version} everywhere instead?

Done.  This was a remnant of when I started working on the package using an
as-yet-untagged GIT tree.

> Use %license not %doc for COPYING COPYING-LGPLV3. You could also duplicate

Done.

> that in the -devel package, without depending on an implicit dependency. 

I know.  I chose not to in accordance with packaging guidelines.

> Not strictly necessary, but it would save a few lines to do:
>    make -C build install ...
>    
>    make -C build test

I actually like how pushd/popd is used consistently to handle this across
sections.

> Requires: elfutils-devel%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} is bad. This makes

Oops, yeah, that's probably too much copy-paste.

> I think the "dwgrep-" component in library subpackages is unnecessary. Just
> call them libzwerg, libzwerg-devel (use %package -n libzwerg, etc.).

Oh, cool, I didn't know this was allowed.

> You must add Provides: bundled(jquery).

I don't think I bundle jquery.  Do I bundle jquery?

Thanks for review.  I'll push an updated package shortly, spinning a test build
now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]