https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166721 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- Hi Mat, thanks for the review. > Please add comments about the separate COPYRIGHT file, where is this from? > Query upstream to include a copy of the license if they do not do so. The Apache license suggests/recommends/requires to include such a file, so I've created one as a starting point: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 →APPENDIX Well, the project moved / seems to fork at github with the same name: https://github.com/tcalmant/python-javaobj > Description contains lines longer than 80 characters fixed. > Package must BR: python2-devel or python3-devel I want to delay a python3 package for now because I do not yet actively use Py3 but I should, you should not have to tell me that. ;) > "maven-local" will pull all of these in for you fixed. > Rpmlint warnings about macros in comments fixed / gone. > Does upstream expect this test to pass and have you reported the problem to them? I guess upstream is aware about the outdated opcodes, there are already some bugs at upstream mentioned with issues at newer java classes or the like. Let's assume that's not that easy to fix. Somehow this module is also available via PyPi, the last commit is from end of 2012 (see my adjustment to release tag). And again, the fork at github looks better: The readme mentions the failing swing test as TODO. - Release #0.3: Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/py/python-javaobj/python-javaobj.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/py/python-javaobj/python-javaobj-0-0.3.20131228gitb8ae821.fc20.src.rpm build rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8439290 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review