https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013836 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- The main reason using %license rather %doc is that (as written in the ticket and some other) %license files is to be included even when --nodoc is explicity specified. As including license text in the binary rpm is almost MUST, it is much preferable that such license text is to be installed at any option. Actually personally I was against using %doc to license text - because it must be always installed and that --nodoc does not include it must be avoided for license files. In such sense license text is not just doc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review