https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142407 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx. | |net) | --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- Just the .so symlink is missing now in the -devel package. One cannot link with -ldrpm without this symlink. The %changelog tells: | - Removed unversioned .so from package That only tells what has been done, not _why_ it has been done. ;-) The better comments in changelogs and in source code give the rationale and answer the "why?". And yes, the upstream drpm Makefile ought to install this symlink to begin with. > %install > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} ... The guidelines recommend %make_install these days (see "rpm -E %make_install" for what it does). %make_install libdir=%{_libdir} includedir=%{_includedir} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review