Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-gettext-package - Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Alias: ruby-gettext-package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237380 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-06 14:24 EST ------- Well: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/ruby-gettext-package.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/ruby-gettext-package-1.9.0-2.fc7.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------ * Mon May 7 2007 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.9.0-2 - Create -doc subpackage For rpmlint: ------------------------------------------------ 1 W: ruby-gettext-package invalid-license Ruby License/LGPL 1 W: ruby-gettext-package-debuginfo invalid-license Ruby License/LGPL 2 E: ruby-gettext-package-doc zero-length /usr/share/doc/ruby-gettext-package-doc-1.9.0/samples/rails/public/favicon.ico 3 W: ruby-gettext-package-doc spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ruby-gettext-package-doc-1.9.0/test/test.sh 1 W: ruby-gettext-package-doc invalid-license Ruby License/LGPL ------------------------------------------------ 1: This type of dual license is very common for ruby related software 2: Well, I am not familiar with "ruby on rails" and I am not sure if I should (can) remove this file or not...... 3: This is okay because this script is actually executable and only /bin/sh dependency is added to -doc subpackage due to this permission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review