Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: boolstuff - Disjunctive Normal Form boolean expression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230710 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-05-06 14:16 EST ------- * Subpackages: I think that booldnf and the library should be separated. In general only one should be needed. The library for C/C++ and booldnf to use it as a command, for example from other languages. It also solves a multilib issue. Now for the package names, it could also be: booldnf in boolstuff library in boolstuff-libs Just tell what you prefer. * I can't see what is wrong with /usr/include/boolstuff-0.1/boolstuff/BoolExpr.cpp? * Other issues are fixed in http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/boolstuff-0.1.11-1.fc7.src.rpm http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/boolstuff.spec - update to 0.1.11 - use a directory for in-source docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review