https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172238 Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 (FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- URL and Source0 are usable. Ok. Source0 archive is original (SHA-256: ec8987517d138ac8a4be3c72ba36d69e06f18378a284f6df03c4f954ceaedaa8). Ok. FATAL: rmd160.c, rmd160.h (and files in under rmd160 which are not used for building) have wrong license: /********************************************************************\ * * FILE: rmd160.c * * CONTENTS: A sample C-implementation of the RIPEMD-160 * hash-function. * TARGET: any computer with an ANSI C compiler * * AUTHOR: Antoon Bosselaers, ESAT-COSIC * DATE: 1 March 1996 * VERSION: 1.0 * * Copyright (c) Katholieke Universiteit Leuven * 1996, All Rights Reserved * \********************************************************************/ Nothing has changed since Crypt-RIPEMD160-0.04. See another review bug #452453. You need formal statement from the "Katholieke Universiteit Leuven" granting you rights required by the Fedora project. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review