Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: netpbm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226191 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-05-05 21:40 EST ------- After a long hiatus, I've found sime time to get back to this. The rpmlind issues are down to: W: netpbm invalid-license Assorted licenses, see /usr/share/doc/netpbm-10.35/copyright_summary E: netpbm configure-without-libdir-spec E: netpbm hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib/lib* All of which are OK. > The 10.35 code tarball is the last published netpbm tarball before the upstream > decided to change a release policy. The tarball comes with hpcd and jpeg2000 > support removed, so it's not the original one. The netpbmdoc tarball is > generated by my scripts from the html pages by makeman. This is the suggested > way how to get netpbm man pages by upstream. My point is that regareless of how the tarballs are generated, the method needs to be documented in the specfile and any scripts you use need to be included. Really, that and a little comment indicating that parallel make doesn't work are the only flaws I see with this package right now (unless I'm forgetting something). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review