[Bug 239159] Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-IPv4Addr - Perl extension for manipulating IPv4 addresses
Alias: perl-Net-IPv4Addr

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239159





------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-05-05 19:21 EST -------
Missing BR on perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) and perl(Test::More); License is
(by convention) generally written as "GPL or Artistic", rather than the other
way around.

Make the above changes, and I'll approve :)

+ source files match upstream:
 57aa8e28ebcd4c0c9f15792740e53d3c  Net-IPv4Addr-0.10.tar.gz
 57aa8e28ebcd4c0c9f15792740e53d3c  ../Net-IPv4Addr-0.10.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license field matches the actual license.
+ license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream.
+ latest version is being packaged.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ compiler flags are appropriate (noarch)
+ %clean is present.
+ package installs properly
+ rpmlint is silent.
+ final provides and requires are sane:
 ** perl=Net-IPv4Addr-0.10-1.fc6.noarch.rpm
 == rpmlint
 == provides
 perl(Net::IPv4Addr) = 0.10
 perl-Net-IPv4Addr = 0.10-1.fc6
 == requires
 /usr/bin/perl  
 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)  
 perl(Carp)  
 perl(Getopt::Long)  
 perl(Net::IPv4Addr)  
 perl(strict)  
 perl(vars) :lcheck is present and all tests pass
+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
+ owns the directories it creates.
+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]