Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - IEEE 1394 based Digital Camera control library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239043 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2007-05-05 15:53 EST ------- Well i was also working on it at the same time but on libdc1394(-1) See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239184 I think that would be fine (as state by Stephanos) not to ship this version. But we can to make a dual installation for testing if needed... As such: i've noticed that svn trunk: "changed libdc1394.pc to libdc1394-2.pc to avoid pkg-config conflicts" that would be good to have svn snapshoot to integrate this change. only this binary (and i suppose libaries also) will conflict with -1: %{_bindir}/dc1394_vloopback We may uses suffix if needed... no need to changes about includedir as : -1 will have libdc1394 -2 will have dc1394 I wonder why libXext-devel was in -1 and not in -2 (will check for -1) I would suggest to rename this package to libdc1394_2 to avoid conflict... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review