https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966 --- Comment #13 from Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Timothy St. Clair from comment #12) > As I had mentioned: > > An important point to clarify is that two things were announced: > > 1. a spec (App Container) > https://github.com/coreos/rocket/blob/master/app-container/SPEC.md > 2. and an implementation (Rocket). > > Meaning, there may well be several implementations to the spec. Yup, comment from upstream author: ----- The coreos rootfs is by no means a hard requirement of rocket - we intend for stage1 and stage0 to be decoupled and modular. However, there's a fairly close relationship between the stage1 init binary and the stage1 rootfs, so if you want to change the latter, you have two options: - Replace it with something that's still compatible with the existing stage1 init binary. This will probably be fairly plausible with something Fedora-based, as long as the systemd is relatively recent (this is basically the main thing we use, as you can see in the mkrootfs.sh) - Roll your own init binary as well as rootfs. In this case, you are free to use whatever you like in both, as long as you can continue to work with the output that the stage0 generates, and then comply with the ACE spec ----- Origin: https://github.com/coreos/rocket/issues/173#issuecomment-65739099 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review