Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239184 Summary: Review Request: libdc1394 - High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: kwizart@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/rpmfusion/libdc1394-1.2.1-1.kwizart.fc6.src.rpm Description: High level API for IEEE 1394 based cameras rpmlint is silent enought on binaries and sources... As this spec files was taken from atrpms version. I will request Axel some advices about replacement policy for this package and his packaging scheme... For example, what is the aim for : %lib_package dc1394_control 13 ? Whereas libs are : [root@Kwizatz lib64]# ls -al total 84 drwxr-xr-x 2 builder builder 4096 mai 5 21:02 . drwxr-xr-x 8 builder builder 4096 mai 5 21:02 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 builder builder 27 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so -> libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 builder builder 27 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so.12 -> libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1 -rwxr-xr-x 1 builder builder 73168 mai 5 21:02 libdc1394_control.so.12.1.1 I was working on libdc1394(-1) before seen -2 from Matthias i would like to work with him in case we choose to provides a -2 version... See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/239043 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review