https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165620 --- Comment #9 from Petr Šabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Colin Macdonald from comment #6) > > Also, v1.9 has been available for a while. Any reason to stick with 1.8? > > Fedora would need a newer texlive-biblatex, I documented this in the spec > file. See also bug #1165437. Aha, I see. I haven't looked at the package yet :) (In reply to Colin Macdonald from comment #7) > I guess (but don't know) that it really needed the a newer Unicode::Collate. > Here is a commit for biber 1.9 which increments it to 1.04: > > https://github.com/plk/biber/commit/4a49c1a679de30a8834bb79844b08e49ced50058 > > I could ask upstream? Or ask you to do the subpackage :) If latter, I'll > file a bug for that. It could be just that the author had that specific version of Unicode::Collate installed. Maybe it's not really required. Or maybe it is. Maybe biber breaks in some situations if Unicode::Collate is too old :) You can ask upstream, sure. I'll subpackage it (next week) anyway. (In reply to Colin Macdonald from comment #8) > BTW, I've noticed I don't have the BR and Requires quite right here. I will > take another pass at it. > > But first: if I need something at both build-time and run-time, do I need to > list it on both? I.e., does build-time inherit the run-time deps? There's no inheritence. These can differ and they often do (e.g. when not everything is tested). You need to list that twice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review