https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168511 --- Comment #7 from Pekka Pietikäinen <pp@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Nice to have radamsa packaged for Fedora :-) (I'm a colleague of the author). Alas, there might be some complications (which have discouraged me from doing a package myself) You may want to note that radamsa.c is actually generated from rad/*.scm (the real source code for radamsa) and that is done by https://code.google.com/p/owl-lisp/ , and thus radamsa.c starts with a sort-of-binary-blob of bytecode. It's all MIT licensed, so no problems with licensing. I doubt anyone wants owl separately packaged, so to 100% comply with all open source guidelines could just include owl in the src.rpm and build owl, rebuild radamsa.c and then build that. Or verify whether fedora blob exception magic could apply here and use upstream radamsa.c like you did here :-) Radamsa git has a license file already, will poke to see whether a 0.3.1 or so with it is possible (or if he's ready to release 0.4) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review