[Bug 238824] Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: schismtracker - sound module composer/player


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238824


ville.skytta@xxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?(ville.skytta@xxxxx|
                   |i)                          |




------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@xxxxxx  2007-05-04 06:36 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Updated. I'm using F7t4 on x86_64. Surprisingly it builds in mock successfully
> even without any deps to X, so that the SDL-devel BuildRequire seems to be
> sufficient.

It is, but doing so leaves support for X, Xkb and Xv out (grep for USE_X in the
source to see what that results in).  Is this really desirable?  If yes, X
should be disabled explicitly by passing --without-x to configure for
reproducible builds.  Otherwise, adding the build deps mentioned in comment 1
would get all X support built in.

The "too many dirs owned" problem mentioned in comment 3 persists.  Now that the
hicolor-icon-theme dep is there, the icon stuff in %files should be changed to
eg. %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*x*/apps/%{name}.*

"Name=Schism Tracker" would be better than "Name=Schismtracker" (to match the
window title) in the .desktop file.

.desktop Categories: Application (invalid) and X-Fedora (unused/unneeded) should
be dropped, and "Audio" could be added in addition to "AudioVideo". 
http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]