[Bug 1114267] Review Request: python-cryptography - PyCA's cryptography library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114267

Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #26 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python-cryptography-0.6.1-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm
          python3-cryptography-0.6.1-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm
          python-cryptography-0.6.1-2.fc22.src.rpm
python-cryptography.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
OK

python-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/primitives/src/constant_time.h
python-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/primitives/src/constant_time.c
Given the explanation in the upstream ticket - OK

python-cryptography.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cryptography/_Cryptography_cffi_8f86901cxc1767c5a.so
0775L
Not sure why this is not 0755 - but not a blocker

python-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/primitives/__pycache__/_Cryptography_cffi_fc665d23x4f158fee.c
python-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/bindings/__pycache__/_Cryptography_cffi_36a40ff0x2bad1bae.c
python-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/primitives/__pycache__/_Cryptography_cffi_8f86901cxc1767c5a.c
Again OK due to the upstream explanation.

python-cryptography.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cryptography/_Cryptography_cffi_36a40ff0x2bad1bae.so
0775L
python-cryptography.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cryptography/_Cryptography_cffi_fc665d23x4f158fee.so
0775L
Same as above.

python3-cryptography.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
cryptographic -> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
Same as above.

python3-cryptography.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/cryptography/_Cryptography_cffi_3dc5d345x2bad1bae.cpython-34m.so
0775L
Same as above.

python3-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/primitives/src/constant_time.c
python3-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/primitives/src/constant_time.h
Same as above.

python3-cryptography.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/cryptography/_Cryptography_cffi_7ab3712bx4f158fee.cpython-34m.so
0775L
Same as above.

python3-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/primitives/__pycache__/_Cryptography_cffi_7ab3712bx4f158fee.c
python3-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/bindings/__pycache__/_Cryptography_cffi_3dc5d345x2bad1bae.c
Same as above.

python3-cryptography.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/cryptography/_Cryptography_cffi_dd416c1exc1767c5a.cpython-34m.so
0775L
Same as above.

python3-cryptography.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/cryptography/hazmat/primitives/__pycache__/_Cryptography_cffi_dd416c1exc1767c5a.c
Same as above.

python-cryptography.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cryptographic
-> cryptography, cryptographer, crystallographic
Same as above.

3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 13 warnings.

Also please consider using the %license tag instead of %doc for the license.

As all of the above are not blockers:

ACCEPT
The package is compliant to Fedora guidelines.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]