https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165620 --- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hmm, well, there's no way to guarantee you will always end up with 2.8+, no matter what you put there. If we suddenly ship texlive-biblatex-5:1.0, it will be considered a newer version because that's just how epoch works. That svn part is also more significant than "2.8", so 4:svn32246.1.0 would also be considered newer. The good thing is it's very unlikely something like that would happen so I would suggest picking the oldest "2.8" release we've had and require that or newer. Which is probably what you're doing :) Also, check out rpmdev-vercmp. It's a helpful tool when you're not sure how rpm would compare certain version string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review