[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348



--- Comment #15 from Ivan Romanov <drizt@xxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #13)
> Re: comment #11
> binaries should be ok, rpm uses binary coloring to prefer native binaries in
> this context.
Yes. I checked it. No any problems. I installed both qca.i686 and qca.x86_64
# rpm -qa | grep qca
qca-devel-2.1.0-2.fc20.i686
qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64
qca-ossl-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64
qca-devel-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64
qca-gnupg-2.1.0-2.fc20.x86_64
qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.i686

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]