https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(lkundrak@xxxxx) | --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #11) > Lubomir, > First, this package is not following Fonts packaging guidelines. Could you please be more specific? I've done my best reading through the guidelines and couldn't find a single violation. That said, none of my packages is a font package and I could be wrong. > Second, > I have not seen the package submitter done any reviews and you sponsored. > How can you be so sure that package submitter knows packaging well. I've gained a reasonable confidence by getting talking to the submitter and getting him address issues in his own package. My understanding is that doing informal reviews is a way to attract sponsor's attention while the decision is of the sponsor. I'm able to be responsible for quality of his package. > Third, > at least you should have let package submitter submit the srpm that fixes > issues raised in comment#6 and then approved this package. Eh? It might not be obvious as he didn't add a comment to Bugzilla, but the actually updated the src.rpm in place. > Please revoke this package approval. Guide the package submitter on how to > follow fonts packaging guidelines. Well, it would be helpful to provide an example of a violation. While I believe you didn't make that up, I can not see any problem. The package looks all sane to me and you didn't prove that wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review