Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the xmlrpc protocol in C Alias: xmlrpc-epi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231809 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|normal |medium j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-05-03 14:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Conflicts with xmlrpc-c-devel? > > Installing packages (4): > xmlrpc-epi-0.51-2@x86_64 xmlrpc-epi-devel-0.51-2@x86_64 > xmlrpc-epi-debuginfo-0.51-2@x86_64 xmlrpc-epi-examples-0.51-2@x86_64 > > 206.9kB of package files are needed. 730.5kB will be used. > > Confirm changes? (Y/n): y > > Committing transaction... > > error: file /usr/lib64/libxmlrpc.so from install of xmlrpc-epi-devel-0.51-2 > conflicts with file from package xmlrpc-c-devel-1.06.11-2.fc6 > Hmm, nasty. Well as xmlrpc-c is I would like to suggest that you rename the lib (and its soname to libxmlrpc-epi.so.X . Can you provide a new package with this fixed? Then I'll do a full review for you. I just rea today that mandrake wants to include the second life client in their next release and I want to beat them to it by having it readuy for Fedora 7 :) So let me know if you need any help with openjpeg or the client itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review