Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocamlSDL - OCaml bindings for SDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2007-05-02 15:00 EST ------- Please update this to be inline with the proposed ocaml guidelines I've just CC-ed you on. This should fix the ocaml naming policy warning. Notice that I expect the main discussion on this proposal to happen on on fedora-devel-list which you can join now. Also you can be added to fedora-maintainers-list before being sponsored, just ask on the devel list. Last please remove the -static provides, I think this is bogus for caml as this are not ordinary static libs. Also the guidelines proposal I just send should explain how / and why freetennis will not require camlSDL / camlimages and why this is not a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review