Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libopenraw - decode camera RAW files. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238373 ------- Additional Comments From trond.danielsen@xxxxxxxxx 2007-05-02 02:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > You now have gui dependencies. Do you intend to break the package into > something like: > > libopenraw > libopenraw-gnome > libopenraw-devel > > or do you think that the majority of users of the package will want all the > components even at the expense of pulling in gui components and all of their > dependencies? That is a good idea! I do not know of anything atm that could make use of libopenraw without the GNOME component, but I assume that it might be useful at some point (perhaps a ImageMagick-style application). Question: Should separate -devel packages be created for libopenraw and libopenraw-gnome, or is it enough to add a requirement for all components to the devel package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review