https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158109 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> --- Release is a bit strange, if this is a 1.4 released version you should start at 1, but perhaps you are doing that because it's in review? I don't see any blockers here, this package is APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- file-validate if there is such a file. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fedora/kevin/review-xfce4-hamster- plugin/licensecheck.txt [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 122880 bytes in 7 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.4-0.2.fc22.x86_64.rpm xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.4-0.2.fc22.src.rpm xfce4-hamster-plugin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP xfce4-hamster-plugin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, GitHub xfce4-hamster-plugin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US projecthamster -> project hamster, project-hamster, projectionist xfce4-hamster-plugin.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xfce4-popup-hamstermenu xfce4-hamster-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP xfce4-hamster-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, GitHub xfce4-hamster-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US projecthamster -> project hamster, project-hamster, projectionist xfce4-hamster-plugin.src:52: W: macro-in-%changelog %find_lang 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint xfce4-hamster-plugin xfce4-hamster-plugin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https -> HTTP xfce4-hamster-plugin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US github -> git hub, git-hub, thuggish xfce4-hamster-plugin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US projecthamster -> project hamster, project-hamster, projectionist xfce4-hamster-plugin.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xfce4-popup-hamstermenu 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- xfce4-hamster-plugin (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh hamster-time-tracker libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libxfce4panel-1.0.so.4()(64bit) libxfce4ui-1.so.0()(64bit) libxfce4util.so.6()(64bit) libxfcegui4.so.4()(64bit) libxfconf-0.so.2()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- xfce4-hamster-plugin: libhamster.so()(64bit) xfce4-hamster-plugin xfce4-hamster-plugin(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- xfce4-hamster-plugin: /usr/lib64/xfce4/panel/plugins/libhamster.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/projecthamster/xfce4-hamster-plugin/archive/v1.4.tar.gz#/xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.4.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 410f4432d46d1a41260f8606835622fa911f2173afe57c122a3819caba35edc9 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 410f4432d46d1a41260f8606835622fa911f2173afe57c122a3819caba35edc9 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n xfce4-hamster-plugin Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review