https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146662 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michal Srb from comment #1) > Tarball contains license texts for ASL 2.0 and LGPLv2+ and spec file > reflects this in license field. However, all source files contain following > header: > > * java-libpst is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify > * it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License as published > by > * the Free Software Foundation, either *version 3* of the License, or > * (at your option) any later version. > > So either license text in tarball (and subsequently license tag in spec > file) is incorrect or license headers in source files are. > > Upstream should decide which version of LGPL license they want to use. report the problem @ https://github.com/rjohnsondev/java-libpst/issues/23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review