https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- The icon-theme.cache file is actually ghosted, which means it is NOT part of the installed size of the hicolor-icon-theme package. The file is NOT created by installing the hicolor-icon-theme package, but it is created on your system by gtk-update-icon-cache, if (and only if) gtk-update-icon-cache is installed. And gtk-update-icon-cache will create that file whether you have the hicolor-icon-theme package installed or not. The actual size of hicolor-icon-theme is only these files: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27095 27. Feb 2014 /usr/share/icons/hicolor/index.theme required by the freedesktop.org icon theme spec. Strictly speaking, installing an icon to hicolor without that file being present is meaningless. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2688 17. Dez 2013 /usr/share/doc/hicolor-icon-theme-0.13/ChangeLog -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17992 17. Dez 2013 /usr/share/doc/hicolor-icon-theme-0.13/COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 433 17. Dez 2013 /usr/share/doc/hicolor-icon-theme-0.13/README Documentation and license files, as per the packaging guidelines. The total installed size of hicolor-icon-theme is a whopping 48208 bytes. I would understand your complaint if we were still shipping the original hicolor-icon-theme from KDE 2, which contained actual icons (that's where the "hicolor" name historically comes from), but as it stands, you are just splitting hairs (or not understanding the meaning of %ghost in RPM). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review