https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152966 Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |ASSIGNED CC| |ville.skytta@xxxxxx Blocks| |496968 (DebugInfo) --- Comment #9 from Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> --- (In reply to Florian "der-flo" Lehner from comment #2) > [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. Why is this "not applicable"? A brief look at the -debuginfo package reveals that it contains no sources, and if rpmlint had been run against it, it would also have reported it: | $ rpmlint -i ./indi-gphoto-debuginfo-0.9.9-2.20141015svn1783.fc22.x86_64.rpm | indi-gphoto-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources | This debuginfo package appears to contain debug symbols but no source files. | This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during | the build, or being compiled without compiler debug flags (which again often | is a sign of distro's default compiler flags ignored which might have security | consequences), or other compiler flags which result in rpmbuild's debuginfo | extraction not working as expected. Verify that the binaries are not | unexpectedly stripped and that the intended compiler flags are used. Looking at the build log it is clear that $RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not being used, and as rpmlint mentions, that's not only a debuginfo issue but also a potential security one. In this case the problem is in the upstream CMakeLists.txt, will attach a patch, please submit it upstream. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496968 [Bug 496968] Tracking bug for packages with debuginfo problems -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review