Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: widelands - realtime-strategy game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238270 mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx 2007-05-01 06:37 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > 2) Consider using just > > Release: 0.build%{buildnum}.%{rel}%{?dist} > > to avoid redundancy in the release tag and have the dist/version tag. It's written in Package Naming Guidelines that we have to use 0.%{X}.%{alphatag} release tag for pre-releases and there's also an example: alsa-lib-0.9.2-0.1.beta1 So let's treat build10 as an %{alphatag} and it'll be indeed compatible with naming guidelines, won't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review