https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140195 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > Who is pkcarlisle-dot-com behind? Write it more as a real name in all places, in the bugzilla account preferences, in the spec file %changelog: "P.K. Carlisle" would be one expected way to write it. Don't use "pkcarlisle-dot-com" even if it resembles your full name. > I really can't figure out what this package is. It violates FHS as well: It doesn't even build. That's no surprise, because no source code archive is included. The spec file accesses paths/files not included in the src.rpm. As a minimum, people who submit packages for review should examine a few Fedora packages (via src.rpms or git) and follow well-known documentation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers Notice the index at the bottom. > Buildroot: %{_sourcedir} I would estimate that none of the many thousand Fedora (and Red Hat) packages does it like that, especially since the purpose of the "Buildroot" is a different one and clearly _not_ the same as %_sourcedir. Nowadays, one doesn't set this tag anymore, btw: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review