https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1133479 Yaniv Bronhaim <ybronhei@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ybronhei@xxxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |ybronhei@xxxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Yaniv Bronhaim <ybronhei@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hello Christopher, Thanks for reviewing this package. Regarding your question, we currently have the requirements of this (vdsm-arch-dependencies) package in vdsm. This causes arch issues while vdsm should not be arch depended. This package helps vdsm to avoid having those dependencies if not required. I refreshed the files and add few spec changes to fit fedora-review requirements. Please review: Spec URL: http://bronhaim.fedorapeople.org/vdsm-arch-dependencies.spec SRPM URL: http://bronhaim.fedorapeople.org/vdsm-arch-dependencies-1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm Description: This package maintains architecture specific dependencies of VDSM. On different architectures, VDSM requires different packages. This package provides a transparent way to handle this. Fedora Account System Username: ybronhei Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review