https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510 --- Comment #64 from nicolas.vieville@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Jeff, Thank you for your message and the clarification you provided. I know that I must review some other packages in order to become a Fedora packager if I want this package being a part of Fedora. I thought (maybe my fault) that I could find the time to achieve at least two reviews. My full time job isn't in the IT and is taking me much time (it's a full time job ;)) ), I can only work on packaging on my free time (after the time for family). However, as you suggested it, and in order to comply with your option A, I approached two candidates for packaging through there review requests asking them if they would be interested by an unofficial review from my part. No response for the moment. Maybe, I should have choose more recent review requests. I'll wait for a little time about them, and will choose more recent review request in case I get no response in the next week. I thank you very much for your encouragement, but when I look at the documentation about packaging for Fedora, I find some topics on which I think I don't have the knowledge necessary to achieve a review on myself without a great investment in time to get them (for example packages containing binary libraries, or ruby, python, .js packages). But, if needed I will find the time to document myself (it's not so difficult, it's only a question of time). Thank you again for your interest. I'll post here and let you know as soon as I have news about the unofficial reviews. Cordially, -- NVieville -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review