https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117025 --- Comment #3 from František Dvořák <valtri@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #2) > > > 5) (question) there is not used "require 'active_record'" anywere in joiner > > sources, but I guess it's OK (developers using joiner will require rails or > > activerecord anyway?) > > Interesting, I guess upstream thinks it's fine to just require it in the > gemspec and not in the actual library. > > In the RPM case, since we Require: rubygem(activerecord) I think it's ok, > but your point is valid that upstream probably needs to think about the > non-Bundler case. > > When you were testing in your chroot, did rubygem-activerecord get installed > there? Or did you install the package with --nodeps? It's weird that it > would break like that for you, since the dependency is in the RPM. Yes, rubygem-activerecord were installed (with the rubygem-rails). The command: ruby -e "require 'active_record'; require 'joiner'" works fine. It is not problem with packaging, and using ActiveRecord already is probably expected. Anyway, package can be approved. I'll create the final report yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review